Tying isn’t just a legal or regulatory buzzword—it’s a practice that can have a big impact on the way Australians buy, borrow, and do business. In 2025, as consumer protection laws and competition watchdogs sharpen their focus, understanding how tying works in finance has never been more crucial. Whether you’re a business owner navigating complex loan packages or a consumer shopping for a mortgage, the way products are bundled together could affect your choices and your bottom line.
In financial services, tying refers to the practice where a provider makes the sale of one product conditional on the purchase of another. For example, a bank might require a customer to take out home insurance with them to access a particular mortgage deal. While some forms of bundling can offer convenience or discounts, tying can cross the line into anti-competitive territory—something that regulators like the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) keep a close eye on.
Under Australian law, not all bundling is illegal—but tying that restricts competition or forces unwanted products on consumers can trigger regulatory action.
This year, the ACCC and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have signalled a renewed focus on anti-competitive tying in the banking, insurance, and superannuation sectors. With the rise of digital finance platforms and the ongoing scrutiny of big bank behaviour, several key policy developments stand out in 2025:
These changes are designed to foster competition and protect Australians from being nudged—or forced—into deals that aren’t in their best interests.
Tying can influence more than just what you buy—it can affect your negotiating power, the true cost of financial products, and even your ability to switch providers. Here’s how:
In 2025, comparison sites and digital brokers are helping to shine a light on bundled offers, but it pays to read the fine print and ask direct questions about any conditions attached to financial deals.
Recent ACCC investigations have uncovered tying in sectors ranging from agribusiness lending (where farmers were required to buy insurance from the same bank) to fintech platforms that linked personal loans with compulsory investment products. In one high-profile 2025 case, a major insurer faced penalties after making income protection cover contingent on purchasing life insurance, sparking widespread consumer backlash and a review of industry practices.
For small businesses, government-backed initiatives now provide guidance and template letters for challenging unfair tying clauses in contracts. Meanwhile, consumer advocacy groups are pushing for even greater transparency and simpler disclosure rules, ensuring Australians can spot and avoid tying traps.
If you suspect you’re being pressured into a tied arrangement, don’t hesitate to:
Knowledge is power—and in the world of finance, knowing your rights around tying can help you save money and make smarter choices.