Determining the value of a business is part art, part science—especially for Australia’s small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In 2025, the Times-Revenue Method is seeing renewed interest as entrepreneurs, accountants, and investors seek quick, market-aligned valuations. But how does this method work, and when does it make sense to use it?
The Times-Revenue Method values a business by multiplying its gross revenue by a sector-specific multiple. This approach is popular for service-based businesses, technology startups, and industries with recurring revenue streams. The method is simple: if a business earns $2 million in annual revenue, and the industry multiple is 1.5, the business is valued at $3 million.
However, this method does not account for a business’s unique cost structure, profitability, or growth potential. That’s why it’s often used alongside more detailed valuation techniques.
In 2025, the Australian business sale market is dynamic. Multiples vary widely by industry, reflecting post-pandemic economic shifts and digital transformation. Here’s what’s new:
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) continues to reference industry benchmarks in its 2025 guidance, emphasising that revenue multiples must be justified with comparable sales or published data. This is critical for compliance—especially for businesses involved in succession planning or capital gains tax (CGT) events.
Let’s say a Sydney-based digital marketing agency reports $1.5 million in annual revenue. Industry reports for 2025 show similar agencies selling for 1.2x to 1.5x revenue. If the agency has long-term contracts and solid client retention, a buyer might be willing to pay the upper end of the range:
However, if most of the agency’s work is project-based or client churn is high, the multiple may drop to 1.1x or lower. This underscores the importance of understanding not just the revenue figure, but also the underlying business model and market appetite in 2025.
The Times-Revenue Method is best suited for businesses with predictable, recurring revenue and industry-standard margins. It’s particularly useful for:
However, it’s not recommended for asset-heavy companies, businesses with irregular income, or where profitability is highly variable. In these cases, discounted cash flow (DCF) or earnings-based methods will give a more accurate picture.