The National Market System (NMS) is a term that’s long been central to the US share market—but in 2025, it’s making waves in Australia. As the Albanese government and ASIC signal interest in market structure reform, it’s crucial for Aussie investors, brokers, and fintechs to understand what an NMS could mean for the local landscape. Could it revolutionise transparency, competition, and execution quality, or is it just another piece of regulatory red tape?
The NMS originated in the United States in the 1970s, designed to foster fair, efficient, and transparent trading across multiple exchanges. Rather than trades being confined to a single exchange, the NMS links various trading venues, allowing investors to access the best available prices nationwide, regardless of where a stock is listed. In 2025, Australia is actively reviewing the merits of a similar system, driven by:
ASIC’s 2025 policy review, following the recommendations from the Council of Financial Regulators, is weighing up whether an NMS could streamline fragmented trading and ensure investors always get the best deal.
If Australia adopts an NMS, the trading landscape could undergo significant transformation. Here’s what investors and industry players can expect:
Globally, the US NMS has had both fans and critics. While it’s improved price discovery and reduced costs, it’s also led to complexity and regulatory arbitrage. Australian policymakers are studying these lessons closely as they chart a local path forward.
So where does Australia stand right now? The 2025 ASIC consultation paper, released in February, outlines several potential models for an NMS. Key proposals include:
The ASX has expressed cautious support, provided the system doesn’t undermine its market integrity. Alternative venues like Cboe Australia are backing reforms that promote competition. Retail brokers, meanwhile, are eager for clarity on compliance costs and the practicalities of routing across fragmented markets.
Some critics argue that an NMS could favour large players with advanced technology, or that it could dampen innovation by imposing a ‘one-size-fits-all’ regulatory regime. Others warn of potential cost increases if data access fees are not tightly controlled.
For everyday investors, the core questions are simple: Will an NMS mean better prices, lower costs, and a fairer market? Or will the benefits be swallowed up by complexity and compliance overheads? As policymakers continue consultations and industry feedback rolls in, watch for:
Whether you’re an active trader or a long-term investor, the shape of Australia’s market infrastructure is set for a shakeup. Staying informed now could mean seizing opportunities—and avoiding pitfalls—when the dust settles.