Once the exclusive preserve of Wall Street, the ‘two and twenty’ fee structure is now a familiar—if controversial—feature of Australian hedge funds and private equity. As the financial landscape in 2025 evolves with new regulations and shifting investor expectations, understanding how this fee model works (and its real cost) is more important than ever for savvy Aussies keen on alternative investments.
The ‘two and twenty’ model refers to a compensation structure used by many hedge funds and private equity managers:
For example, if you invest $1 million in a hedge fund that returns 10% in a year, the manager takes $20,000 (2%) as a management fee. If the fund generates $100,000 in profit, the manager claims $20,000 (20% of profits) as a performance fee—leaving you with $80,000 before taxes and other costs.
This structure has drawn criticism for rewarding managers regardless of performance and for potentially incentivising riskier strategies. However, proponents argue that the performance fee aligns manager and investor interests.
This year, ASIC has sharpened its focus on fee transparency, with new disclosure rules taking effect from March 2025. Fund managers must now provide clearer, more detailed breakdowns of all fees—including the impact of ‘two and twenty’—in client statements and PDS documents. These changes aim to help investors make genuinely informed decisions, particularly as Australia’s pool of hedge fund assets surpasses $140 billion.
Key 2025 trends include:
For retail investors, this means more choice—but also more complexity. Understanding exactly what you’re paying for is critical, especially as some funds layer on additional administration or exit fees.
Let’s look at two hypothetical Australian hedge funds in 2025:
The difference is stark—and underscores why fee scrutiny matters. Over a decade, the compounding effect of higher fees can erode hundreds of thousands from your final balance.
Notably, some emerging Australian funds are now offering zero management fee structures, charging only a performance fee. This radical approach, though rare, is gaining traction among fintech-driven managers looking to disrupt the old guard.
Not necessarily. While the model has its critics, many top-performing funds still use it, and for some investors, access to unique strategies or uncorrelated returns justifies the cost. The key is to:
In a world of ETFs and low-cost index funds, ‘two and twenty’ is no longer the only game in town. But for those seeking diversification, the right fund (with fair fees) can still play a valuable role in a well-constructed portfolio.