Australia’s tax landscape is always evolving, with 2025 bringing renewed debate over the merits of proportional tax systems. As the government reviews fiscal policy to address budget pressures and cost-of-living concerns, understanding how a proportional tax works—and its implications for households and businesses—has never been more relevant.
A proportional tax, often dubbed a “flat tax,” applies the same tax rate to all taxpayers regardless of income level. Unlike progressive systems (where rates increase with income) or regressive models (where lower incomes pay a higher percentage), proportional taxes keep things simple: everyone pays the same share.
This year, proportional tax is back in the news. With bracket creep eroding take-home pay and ongoing cost-of-living pressures, several policymakers and think tanks have floated the idea of a flat tax as a way to streamline the system. The Productivity Commission’s 2025 interim report raised proportional tax as a possible approach to reduce complexity and compliance costs, particularly for small businesses and sole traders.
Key drivers behind the renewed debate include:
However, critics warn a flat tax could reduce government revenue and disproportionately benefit higher-income earners, potentially widening inequality. Modelling released in March 2025 by the Grattan Institute found that a 20% flat tax rate would reduce the overall tax take by billions, unless paired with the removal of concessions or a broadening of the GST base.
The impact of switching to a proportional tax would depend on the chosen rate and how it interacts with existing tax offsets, welfare programs, and deductions.
One scenario under review by Treasury in 2025 involves a 22% flat rate, with targeted tax credits to protect lower-income households. This hybrid approach is designed to balance simplicity with fairness, but it remains contentious as stakeholders debate the right balance between efficiency and equity.
Australia wouldn’t be the first to consider or implement a proportional tax. Countries like Estonia and Russia have adopted flat tax rates, with mixed results:
These examples suggest that while proportional tax can deliver administrative benefits, it’s not a cure-all—and must be carefully tailored to local economic and social needs.
The 2025 proportional tax debate is more than academic. It speaks to the heart of how Australians believe resources should be shared, and how government should fund essential services. Whether proportional tax becomes a reality or remains an economic thought experiment, it’s crucial for households and businesses to stay informed and engaged as tax policy evolves.